Cancer treatment has always been a war of attrition. Chemotherapy drugs flood the body, killing cancer cells but ravaging healthy tissue in the process. Radiation burns tumors but damages surrounding organs. Surgery removes visible masses but misses microscopic spread. For decades, oncologists faced an impossible trade-off: hit the disease hard enough to kill it, or preserve quality of life. Rarely could they achieve both.
The challenge wasn’t potency—many drugs could obliterate cancer cells in a petri dish. The problem was delivery. How do you get toxic compounds to concentrate in tumors while sparing the heart, liver, kidneys, and bone marrow? How do you penetrate dense tumor tissue where blood vessels are chaotic and defensive barriers are formidable? How do you overcome the cancer cell’s ability to pump drugs back out before they can work?
Traditional medicine had no answer. Nanotechnology did.
Over the past three decades, three pioneers working independently at Rice University and MIT transformed cancer treatment by engineering particles measured in billionths of a meter. Their approaches differ radically—one uses heat, another uses staged chemical release, a third embeds drugs in biodegradable polymers—but all three share a fundamental insight: if you can’t make better drugs, make smarter delivery systems.
When Gold Becomes Medicine

Naomi Halas spent the 1990s at Rice University studying the optical properties of metallic nanostructures. In 1997, she invented something unexpected: a nanoshell consisting of a silica core surrounded by a thin gold layer. The structure was roughly 150 nanometers in diameter—about 500 times smaller than the width of a human hair.
The physics were elegant. When illuminated with near-infrared light—wavelengths that pass harmlessly through human tissue—the gold layer absorbed the energy and converted it to heat. The temperature spike was localized and intense, hot enough to destroy cancer cells but contained within nanometers. Halas realized she could inject these particles into tumors, wait for them to accumulate, then illuminate the tissue with an external laser. The cancer would cook from the inside while surrounding healthy tissue remained unharmed.
The concept, called photothermal therapy, moved from theory to mice to human trials. In 2019, Halas and her team published results in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences that startled the oncology community. They treated 16 men with low-to-intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer using their AuroLase therapy. Patients received an injection of gold nanoshells directly into the prostate, followed 24 hours later by near-infrared laser treatment delivered through optical fibers. Each session lasted roughly 25 minutes.
After one year, 13 of the 15 men who completed the trial showed no evidence of cancer. That’s an 87% success rate for a single treatment session with minimal side effects. Traditional treatments—surgery or radiation—often cause incontinence, impotence, and require lengthy recovery periods. The nanoshell patients experienced mild discomfort and returned to normal activity within days.
The company Halas co-founded, Nanospectra Biosciences, expanded trials to additional sites including Mount Sinai Hospital in New York and the University of Michigan. By the time clinical development paused, 44 patients had been treated. The therapy demonstrated that nanotechnology could transform an aggressive, life-altering disease into an outpatient procedure.
Halas’s work didn’t stop at prostate cancer. Her nanoshells are being tested for head and neck cancers, lung tumors, and other solid masses where direct injection and laser access are feasible. The platform technology—tunable gold nanoshells that convert light to heat—represents a fundamentally new treatment modality that wouldn’t exist without nanoscale engineering.
Building Nanoparticles Layer by Layer

While Halas weaponized heat, Paula Hammond at MIT pursued a different strategy: precision engineering of drug-loaded nanoparticles. Her innovation, called layer-by-layer assembly, builds particles by depositing alternating layers of oppositely charged molecules—polymers, lipids, drugs, and genetic material—one nanometer-thick layer at a time.
The technique offers unprecedented control. Hammond can load multiple drugs into a single particle, stacking them in specific sequences. She can coat the exterior with targeting molecules that bind to cancer cell receptors. She can engineer the layers to degrade at different rates, releasing drugs in a staged sequence. The result is a programmable delivery vehicle that responds to the tumor’s environment.
Hammond focused her attention on ovarian cancer, one of the deadliest malignancies affecting women. Ovarian tumors develop resistance to chemotherapy by activating efflux pumps that eject drugs before they can work. Hammond’s particles deliver a two-punch combination: first, a snippet of RNA that silences the gene producing the efflux pump; second, a chemotherapy drug that floods in before the cancer cell can rebuild its defenses.
In animal models, the results were dramatic. Mice with ovarian tumors treated with Hammond’s dual-loaded nanoparticles showed significantly greater tumor reduction compared to either drug alone. The particles accumulated in tumors due to their size—cancer vasculature is leaky, allowing nanoparticles to slip through while preventing their exit—and released their payload in stages over days.
Hammond’s work earned recognition from the Department of Defense, which awarded her the Ovarian Cancer Teal Innovator Award in 2013 for translational research. Her layer-by-layer platform has since expanded to triple-negative breast cancer, one of the most aggressive and treatment-resistant forms of the disease. In preclinical studies, her particles achieved an eight-fold reduction in tumor volume compared to standard chemotherapy.
She co-founded LayerBio Inc. to commercialize the technology. The company is developing nanoparticle formulations for clinical trials, translating two decades of academic research into therapies that could reach patients within years. Hammond’s particles represent a shift from blunt-force chemotherapy to intelligent, responsive drug delivery systems that adapt to each tumor’s unique biology.
The Polymer That Changed Oncology
Robert Langer’s contributions to cancer treatment predate the modern nanotechnology era, but his work laid the foundation for everything that followed. In the 1970s, as a young chemical engineer at MIT, Langer tackled a problem most researchers considered unsolvable: how to release drugs slowly over weeks or months from a biocompatible material implanted in the body.
The medical establishment insisted it couldn’t be done. Langer proved them wrong by developing biodegradable polymers that could be loaded with drugs and engineered to degrade at controlled rates. His materials released compounds steadily as the polymer broke down into harmless byproducts metabolized by the body.
In 1996, the FDA approved Gliadel, a dime-sized polymer wafer loaded with the chemotherapy drug carmustine. Neurosurgeons place up to eight wafers directly into the brain cavity after removing a glioblastoma—an aggressive brain cancer with a median survival measured in months. As the wafers dissolve over two to three weeks, they release chemotherapy directly at the tumor site, avoiding the blood-brain barrier that blocks most systemic drugs.
Clinical trials demonstrated clear benefits. For patients with recurrent glioblastoma, Gliadel extended six-month survival from 36% to 56%. For newly diagnosed patients, two-year survival increased from 6% to 31%. These gains might seem modest, but in a disease as lethal as glioblastoma, they represent months of additional life for patients who otherwise have none.
Langer’s polymer technology became the template for controlled drug delivery across medicine. His research group has developed nanoparticle systems, microchips that release drugs on command, and injectable gels that form depots in the body. He holds over 1,400 patents and has co-founded more than 35 companies, including Moderna, which used his lipid nanoparticle technology to deliver mRNA vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic.
At 43, Langer became the youngest person ever elected to all three branches of the U.S. National Academies—Medicine, Science, and Engineering. His influence extends beyond cancer into tissue engineering, vaccine delivery, and regenerative medicine. But his Gliadel wafer remains a landmark: the first demonstration that localized, controlled release of chemotherapy could improve outcomes in a disease where systemic treatment had failed.
The Path Forward
These three approaches—photothermal destruction, programmable nanoparticles, and biodegradable polymers—illustrate nanotechnology’s versatility in oncology. Halas eliminated tumors with heat and light. Hammond silenced resistance genes before delivering chemotherapy. Langer bypassed biological barriers by placing drugs exactly where they were needed. Each solved a different problem, but all three succeeded because they engineered solutions at the nanoscale.
The impact extends beyond individual patients. Halas’s nanoshells demonstrated that nanoparticles could be manufactured consistently, injected safely, and activated precisely in human tissue. Hammond’s layer-by-layer assembly proved that nanoparticles could carry multiple therapeutic agents and release them on schedule. Langer’s polymers showed that biodegradable materials could replace permanent implants and eliminate the need for removal surgeries.
Side-by-Side Comparison Table
| Category | Naomi Halas – Nanoshells | Paula Hammond – Layer-by-Layer Nanoparticles | Robert Langer – Biodegradable Polymers |
| Core Technology | Gold-silica nanoshells (150nm diameter) that convert near-infrared light to heat | Alternating layers of polymers, drugs, and RNA assembled nanometer by nanometer | Biodegradable polymer wafers that release drugs as material degrades |
| Mechanism of Action | Photothermal therapy: Particles injected into tumor absorb NIR light and generate localized heat to destroy cancer cells | Staged drug delivery: First releases RNA to silence drug resistance genes, then delivers chemotherapy | Controlled local release: Wafer placed in surgical cavity releases chemotherapy directly at tumor site over 2-3 weeks |
| Target Cancers | Prostate cancer (clinical trials completed), head and neck cancers, lung tumors | Ovarian cancer, triple-negative breast cancer | Glioblastoma (brain cancer) |
| Clinical Status | Human clinical trials completed: 44 patients treated across multiple sites (Mount Sinai, University of Michigan, Texas) | Preclinical studies completed; clinical trials underway through LayerBio Inc. | FDA-approved since 1996 (Gliadel wafer); in active clinical use |
| Key Clinical Results | 87% cancer-free rate (13 of 15 patients) after one year in prostate cancer trial; single 25-minute treatment session | 8-fold tumor reduction in triple-negative breast cancer models; significantly greater tumor reduction in ovarian cancer models vs. single drugs | 6-month survival: 56% vs. 36% (recurrent glioblastoma); 2-year survival: 31% vs. 6% (newly diagnosed) |
| Treatment Delivery | Minimally invasive: Direct injection into tumor followed by external laser application 24 hours later | Intravenous injection; nanoparticles accumulate in tumors via leaky vasculature (EPR effect) | Surgical implantation: Up to 8 wafers placed during tumor removal surgery |
| Key Advantages | • Non-invasive activation<br>• Minimal side effects<br>• Outpatient procedure<br>• Preserves organ function<br>• Single treatment session | • Overcomes drug resistance<br>• Multi-drug delivery in single particle<br>• Programmable release sequence<br>• Targets tumor microenvironment | • Bypasses blood-brain barrier<br>• Localized high-dose delivery<br>• Avoids systemic toxicity<br>• Biodegradable (no removal needed) |
| Company/Commercialization | Nanospectra Biosciences (co-founded by Halas) | LayerBio Inc. (co-founded by Hammond) | Multiple companies; Gliadel commercialized by Arbor Pharmaceuticals |
| Size/Scale | 150 nanometers (about 500x smaller than human hair) | 50-200 nanometers (size-optimized for tumor accumulation) | Wafer: 1.45cm diameter, 1mm thick; polymer degrades to nanoscale fragments |
| Treatment Duration | 25-minute laser session (after 24-hour particle accumulation) | Continuous release over 48-72 hours as layers degrade | 2-3 weeks of sustained drug release |
| Recovery Time | Days; mild discomfort, patients return to normal activity quickly | Standard chemotherapy monitoring protocols | Post-surgical recovery (standard for brain surgery) |
| Innovation Timeline | Nanoshells invented 1997; clinical trials 2010s; results published 2019 | Layer-by-layer technique developed early 2000s; ovarian cancer application 2010s | Polymer technology developed 1970s-1980s; FDA approval 1996 |
Today, over 50 nanomedicine products have received regulatory approval worldwide, with hundreds more in clinical development. The global nanomedicine market is projected to exceed 350 billion dollars by 2030, driven largely by oncology applications. Nanoparticles are being tested against lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, melanoma, and blood cancers. Some carry immunotherapy drugs. Others deliver gene-editing tools. A few combine diagnostics and therapy in a single platform, detecting tumors while treating them.
The promise isn’t just better outcomes—it’s survivable treatment. Chemotherapy’s brutality has always been justified by its necessity. Nanotechnology offers an alternative: precision strikes that spare the patient while eliminating the disease. These three pioneers proved it could be done. Now the challenge is scaling their innovations to reach the millions of patients who need them.











